Define
Choose a small set of commercially relevant questions and document the provider, date and geographic frame.
Use bounded, provider-specific observations to understand whether a firm appears in relevant AI answers, which sources are cited, and whether the path from discovery to inquiry is clear.
AI visibility is the observable presence of a firm, attorney or source within a defined sample of AI-assisted discovery. It is not a permanent ranking, a complete market census or proof that a system caused a prospective client to contact the firm.
A useful measurement starts with a recorded question set, provider, date, geography where relevant, and evidence from the answer and cited sources. Results should distinguish OBSERVED, NOT_OBSERVED and UNAVAILABLE. NOT_OBSERVED means only that the firm did not appear in that sample at that time. NOT_OBSERVED does not mean invisible.
The discovery surface is distributed. A firm website matters, but so do attorney profiles, legal directories, bar and professional entities, local references, original research and other sources a system may use. The practical goal is a coherent, authoritative source layer and a clear path for a person to evaluate the firm and make an inquiry.
AlphaForge uses Observation → Question → Discovery → Diagnosis → Recommendation. AI Discovery is only the opening: AI Discovery → inquiry → intake → consultation → retained matter → relationship → reputation/referral → revenue. Each join remains distinct and requires first-party evidence.
Record the buyer questions, provider, date, geography and observation method so the result can be interpreted without pretending it covers every possible answer.
Review whether the firm appears, which sources are cited, and whether owned and third-party information consistently describes the firm, attorneys and relevant services.
Check whether a person can move from an answer or citation to a useful practice page, understand the firm, and reach a measurable inquiry path.
Choose a small set of commercially relevant questions and document the provider, date and geographic frame.
Preserve answer evidence, citations and unavailable responses without treating one run as a durable position.
Mark each sample observed, not observed or unavailable, then separate owned-page gaps from third-party source gaps.
Review the cited or surfaced path through the website, intake and attribution stages before recommending a correction.
Activity, inquiries, consultations, retained matters and revenue remain separate. The implementation measures only the joins the available evidence supports.
AI answers can vary by provider, model, date, geography, context and source availability. A bounded sample can document what appeared under defined conditions, but it cannot establish a universal or permanent ranking.
No. It means the firm did not appear in the recorded sample. Other questions, providers, dates or contexts may produce different answers, so the result should guide investigation rather than support an absolute claim.
Only when first-party inquiry and matter data support the connection. A person may self-report AI-assisted discovery, but that remains different from synthetic visibility testing and does not prove causation.
Make the path from discovery to a qualified inquiry visible and governed.
ExploreKeep discovery, inquiry, consultation and retained matter as distinct stages.
ExploreDefine sources, permissions, review and change control for AI-supported work.
ExploreThe Firm Intelligence Audit reviews acquisition, client operations, reputation, governance and implementation before AlphaForge recommends what—if anything—to build.